Implementing CobTree: Step-by-Step Guide and Examples### Overview
CobTree is a hypothetical (or specialized) tree-based data structure designed to combine characteristics of balanced search trees and cache-optimized layouts for fast lookups, inserts, and range queries. This guide explains concepts, design choices, algorithms, and practical implementation steps with code examples and performance considerations.
Goals and Design Principles
- Fast point queries: optimize search path length and node layout for cache friendliness.
- Efficient inserts/deletes: maintain balance with low restructuring cost.
- Range queries and scans: support ordered traversal with minimal pointer overhead.
- Concurrency-friendly: enable lock-free or fine-grained locking approaches for parallel workloads.
- Space efficiency: compact node representations and optional compression of keys/values.
High-level Structure
A CobTree mixes traits from B-trees, cache-oblivious trees (hence “Cob”), and skiplist-like layering for simple rebalancing:
- Nodes store multiple keys and child pointers like a B-tree node.
- Within each node, keys are stored in contiguous arrays to improve spatial locality.
- Nodes are split/merged like B-trees to maintain node occupancy invariants.
- Optionally, a top layer of finger-like pointers or “shortcuts” speeds access to frequently used subtrees.
Core invariants
- Each node (except root) holds between ceil(M/2) and M keys, where M is the node capacity.
- Keys within a node are sorted.
- Child pointers are one more than keys (for internal nodes).
- Leaves are linked (doubly or singly) for efficient ordered scans.
Data structures (conceptual)
- Node {
Choosing parameters
- Node capacity M: pick based on cache line size and average key size. For small keys (integers), M might be 32–128 to fill L1/L2 caches efficiently. For larger keys, use smaller M.
- Maximum tree height: O(log_M N).
- For concurrency: consider lock per node or optimistic lock-coupling.
Implementation: Step-by-step (simplified B-tree-like approach)
Below is a clear, working single-threaded implementation in Python for clarity. It focuses on basic operations: search, insert, split, and range scan. This is educational and omits concurrency and persistence features.
# cobtree.py from bisect import bisect_left class Node: def __init__(self, is_leaf=True, capacity=4): self.is_leaf = is_leaf self.keys = [] self.values = [] # used only in leaves self.children = [] # used only in internals self.next = None self.capacity = capacity def __repr__(self): if self.is_leaf: return f"Leaf(keys={self.keys})" return f"Node(keys={self.keys})" class CobTree: def __init__(self, capacity=4): assert capacity >= 3, "capacity too small" self.root = Node(is_leaf=True, capacity=capacity) self.capacity = capacity def search(self, key): node = self.root while not node.is_leaf: i = bisect_left(node.keys, key) # choose child: if i < len(keys) and key == keys[i], go right child i+1; else child i if i < len(node.keys) and node.keys[i] == key: node = node.children[i+1] else: node = node.children[i] # leaf i = bisect_left(node.keys, key) if i < len(node.keys) and node.keys[i] == key: return node.values[i] return None def _split_child(self, parent, index, child): # split child into two nodes, push median up mid = len(child.keys) // 2 median_key = child.keys[mid] # create new sibling sibling = Node(is_leaf=child.is_leaf, capacity=child.capacity) # move right half keys/values/children to sibling sibling.keys = child.keys[mid+1:] child.keys = child.keys[:mid] if child.is_leaf: sibling.values = child.values[mid+1:] child.values = child.values[:mid+1] # keep median value in left for this simple variant # link leaves sibling.next = child.next child.next = sibling else: sibling.children = child.children[mid+1:] child.children = child.children[:mid+1] # insert median into parent parent.keys.insert(index, median_key) parent.children.insert(index+1, sibling) def _insert_nonfull(self, node, key, value): if node.is_leaf: i = bisect_left(node.keys, key) if i < len(node.keys) and node.keys[i] == key: node.values[i] = value return node.keys.insert(i, key) node.values.insert(i, value) else: i = bisect_left(node.keys, key) if i < len(node.keys) and node.keys[i] == key: i += 1 child = node.children[i] if len(child.keys) >= self.capacity: self._split_child(node, i, child) # after split, decide which child to descend if key > node.keys[i]: i += 1 self._insert_nonfull(node.children[i], key, value) def insert(self, key, value): root = self.root if len(root.keys) >= self.capacity: new_root = Node(is_leaf=False, capacity=self.capacity) new_root.children.append(root) self._split_child(new_root, 0, root) self.root = new_root self._insert_nonfull(self.root, key, value) def range_scan(self, low=None, high=None): # find leftmost leaf to start node = self.root while not node.is_leaf: node = node.children[0] results = [] while node: for k, v in zip(node.keys, node.values): if (low is None or k >= low) and (high is None or k <= high): results.append((k, v)) elif high is not None and k > high: return results node = node.next return results Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__": t = CobTree(capacity=4) for k in [10, 20, 5, 6, 12, 30, 7, 17]: t.insert(k, f"val{k}") print("Search 12:", t.search(12)) print("Range 6..17:", t.range_scan(6, 17)) print("Root:", t.root) Explanation of key choices
- Using arrays for keys and values in nodes improves cache locality compared with many small child nodes.
- Splitting on capacity mirrors B-tree behavior; median promotion keeps balance.
- Leaf linking enables fast ordered scans without full tree traversal.
- This implementation keeps the median value in left leaf for simplicity; production CobTree variants might move median differently or maintain different invariants for exact occupancy.
Concurrency and durability (brief)
- For concurrent access, consider lock-coupling (hand-over-hand locks) or per-node read-write locks; stronger options include lock-free algorithms with atomic CAS for pointer updates.
- For persistence, write nodes to disk as fixed-size pages and use a copy-on-write approach for updates; maintain a WAL (write-ahead log) for crash recovery.
Performance tuning
- Tune node capacity to match target cache level. Example: if each key+pointer is 16 bytes and L1 cache line is 64 bytes, choose capacity to fill several cache lines.
- Batch inserts to reduce splits.
- Use SIMD or memmove for bulk key shifts on insert/split if language supports it (C/C++).
Testing and validation
- Unit tests: search/insert/delete consistency, invariants after operations, height bounds.
- Fuzz testing: random operations and cross-validate against a reference (e.g., Python dict + sorted list).
- Benchmarks: measure throughput/latency for workloads that match target use (point reads, mixed reads/writes, range scans).
Variants and extensions
- Adaptive node sizes: allow nodes to dynamically resize based on access patterns.
- Multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) to enable snapshot reads.
- Compression of keys/values inside nodes (prefix compression for strings).
- Hybrid persistence: in-memory root + on-disk leaf pages.
Summary
Implementing a CobTree involves combining B-tree-style node management with cache-friendly layouts and optional shortcuts for hot paths. The provided Python example demonstrates core operations and a starting point for tuning, concurrency, and persistence enhancements.
Leave a Reply